Nats back call for Senate probe into red meat processing competition

James Nason, 12/03/2015
NSW Farmers says it believes there is Parliamentary support for an inquiry into market consolidation in the red meat processing sector.

NSW Farmers says it believes there is Parliamentary support for an inquiry into market consolidation in the red meat processing sector.

The chances of a senate probe into market consolidation in the red meat processing sector going ahead are strengthening following confirmation that three Nationals Senators are already drawing up the Terms of Reference required for an inquiry to proceed.

The call for a senate inquiry was launched by the NSW Farmers Association and Victorian Farmers Federation last month after several processors decided not to compete at the first cattle sale held at the new Barnawatha saleyards near Wodonga.

Only Teys Australia has spoken publicly about its decision not to compete at the sale, telling Beef Central at the time that it would not compete under the policy of pre-weighing cattle adopted by the centre.

Teys general manager livestock Geoff Teys told Beef Central that the company had explained to local agents when construction commenced at the facility more than a year ago, and again six months ago, that it would not compete on cattle at the centre if a pre-weigh only system was in place.

The company’s preferred option, suggested to Barnawatha agents, was to offer both pre and post-weigh selling, and “let the market sort it out.”

The concern processors have with pre-sale weighing is the impact it has on inconsistency in dressing percentage in slaughter cattle.

Cattle which have travelled a long distance prior to sale or have been under a long curfew can be empty while others can be full. The result is that cattle that are identical on a pre-sale weight basis can produce a five percent difference in final dressing percentage in the abattoir.

Processors say post-weigh selling provides more yield consistency, which gives them greater confidence to bid up, knowing what the yield performance is likely to be at the meatworks. The overwhelming majority of saleyards across Eastern Australia operate on as post-sale weigh basis, for this reason.

The absence of several processor buyers at the first Barnawatha sale has been widely attributed as the reason for a 20-30c/kg fall in prices at that sales compared to the previous Wodonga sale.

Some deny, however, that their non-attendance at the sale had anything to do with protest. In the case of the nation’s largest processor, JBS Australia, it had lost two days’ kill at its major Dinmore plant just prior to the sale, due to technical problems, greatly reducing its requirement for cattle.

The NSW FA and VFF have since used that incident and the recent JBS take over of Primo to launch a campaign for a senate inquiry into market consolidation in the red meat processing sector.

Nationals Senator for Queensland Barry O'Sullivan.

Nationals Senator for Queensland Barry O’Sullivan.

Senators back inquiry call

Those calls have now been supported by Nationals Senators Barry O’Sullivan, John Williams and Bridget McKenzie.

In a statement released to media this week, the Senators said that the saleyards boycott at Barnawatha and the loss of another buyer through the takeover of Primo meant that it was time for the issue of market consolidation in red meat processing to be brought into the public domain.

The Senators said they are currently drafting a Terms of Reference for a Senate Inquiry, which will cover collusion of buyers, market powers, pre and post-sale weighing and other aspects.

It is expected the Senate Inquiry could be approved by parliament as soon as the next sitting fortnight.

Senator O’Sullivan said the concentration of foreign ownership in the processing sector and ongoing producer concerns about potential market imbalances in the beef supply chain justified a Senate inquiry.

“There were a lot of questions raised about farm gate profitability and price transparency during the recent Senate Inquiry into grass fed beef levies,” Senator O’Sullivan said.

“I have also travelled extensively through Western Queensland since becoming a Senator last year and many producers have expressed ongoing concern over the market powers of the processing sector.

“These Senator inquiries are important to take a closer look at our beef industry and determine the steps we need to go forward.

“We must ensure the underlying structures of our beef sector remain strong.”

Senator McKenzie said there should be a level playing field across the supply chain.

“As if drought, the high dollar, low commodity prices and the live exports ban has not been enough to battle through, now they are being knocked down again,” Senator McKenzie said.

“The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission is investigating the buyer boycott at Barnawartha saleyards earlier this month – an action that has led to allegations that processors are mistreating farmers.

“No-one can explain to a cattle producer why his returns are diminishing yet in the supermarket the retail price for beef has continued to rise upwards of $16 a kilo.”

Senator Williams said he was disappointed with the JBS /Primo result last week.

He added that current competition laws needed to be reviewed to stop similar occurrences into the future.

“Producers and those in the livestock industry are adamant this will reduce competition,” Senator Williams said.

“I am extremely concerned at the buyers boycott in Victoria and glad the ACCC is investigating if any laws were broken. “

An inquiry into the red meat processing industry will explore many issues because producers should not be battered from pillar to post.”

Beef Central sought comments from Labor Senator and chair of the Rural and Regional Affairs and Transport committee Glenn Sterle earlier this week on whether Labor Senators were likely to support an inquiry but had not received a reply by the time of publishing this article.



Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Your comment will not appear until it has been moderated.
Contributions that contravene our Comments Policy will not be published.


  1. Philip Downie, 14/03/2015

    Not doubting Jennifers’ work, a lot has happened since the 1980s in instrumentation, understanding of critical factors, customer perception eating quality to name a few. I would think it would not be a bad idea to relook at this as the timeframes can be relatively short to quite long and variable. Something I would put on a list of things to invest money in.

  2. Philip Downie, 13/03/2015

    So how does this extra long period before weighing affect eating quality? There was a time when cattle through the yards weren’t MSA and that was with pre weigh. So how much is it going to affect MSA gradings. I await the industry response or is it all just rubbish talk about eating quality?

    Hello Philip. Jennifer Wythes did some definitive research on this subject as part of her meat science PhD back in the 1980s, on which much of the current conventions on pre and post-weigh polices are based. Processors say they are acutely aware of the risk of negatively impacting on tenderness or meat quality, and maintain that the current post-weigh ‘standard’ (apart from those few outlier saleyards in Victoria) does nothing to harm eating quality or tenderness performance. Editor

  3. Loretta Carroll, 12/03/2015

    Geoff Teys comments wanting consistent empty gut should not be considered the norm. The pre-weigh system allows for a 6 hour curfew providing a 5% discount to full weight, this is considered the norm. Than when you consider most cattle are yarded an hour or two prior to pick-up and depending of distance to sale yards would usually have well above the 6 hour curfew. Post weighing leads to animal welfare issues as animals can be held in yards for minimum of 12 to over 30 hours or more before weighing and up to and over 48 hours before delivery to processing plant (ensuring consistently empty empty!!).

Get Beef Central's news headlines emailed to you -