Facebook Twitter

Industry fears quad bike changes could be dangerous

by Jon Condon, 31 May 2018
2

ATV manufacturers, dealers and farmers are uniting to fight proposed engineering changes to quad bikes, fearing they could do more harm than good.

The ACCC is pushing for mandatory Crush Protection Devices (CPDs) on All-Terrain Vehicles (ATVs) but industry research and other survey data show that they can cause as many injuries as they may prevent.

The Federal Chamber of Automotive Industries (FCAI), farmers and dealers have called for the ACCC to objectively review all the research and existing safety data before making any recommendations.

The FCAI is concerned that there is an ill-informed rush to install CPDs without solid evidence to support their use. Instead, the FCAI is proposing the ‘known safety practices’ of mandating helmets for all ATV riders, banning children aged under 16 from riding adult ATVs, and banning passengers from riding single-seat ATVs. The FCAI is also encouraging rider training so riders are more aware of safe practice, correct riding techniques and avoiding risky situations.

Finley livestock farmer Neville Kydd

Livestock farmer Neville Kydd, from Finley in southern NSW, says quad bikes are essential for his business but he fears rollover protection devices would make them less safe and less efficient.

“From what we have seen, we don’t think that CPDs will help make quad bikes any safer,” he said.

“Our farm is set up with electric gates that we drive under; it would be very difficult to go under them with roll bars so they wouldn’t be user-friendly machines. It would make them substantially less efficient.”

Mr Kydd backs FCAI suggestions for accredited training programs and mandatory helmets. “Training is the most important part,” he said.

Dealer principal for Peter Hill Honda in Numurkah, David Forman, says CPDs on quad bikes wouldn’t be practical. “They wouldn’t allow for good rear rack use, for example carrying sprayers, and they could catch on trees,” he said.

Mr Forman said that quad bikes were the base of his business. “No quads equal no business,” he added.

He supported FCAI calls for improved training as the best way to improve safety. “I’ve been riding quads for 25 years and selling them for 10 years and have never had an accident,” he said. “It’s all about shifting your weight to counter the bike’s weight, applying common sense and riding to the conditions. We could die from many other things on a farm, but we don’t ban them.”

FCAI ATV safety expert Mark Collins said there was comprehensive evidence that other safety measures, such as making helmets obligatory, keeping children off adult-sized quad bikes and not carrying passengers on single-seat quad bikes, would cut deaths by more than 50 per cent.

“There is no conclusive scientific evidence that CPDs improve safety; in fact, new independent data shows they can cause just as many serious injuries as they may prevent,” Mr Collins said.

“On the other hand, the FCAI recommendations, based on real-world evidence, could happen quickly, easily, at minimal cost and begin saving lives immediately.”

“What the ACCC is proposing would introduce unproven engineering characteristics in a live experiment with real humans.”

There have been three coronial inquests investigating 29 deaths on ATVs but Mr Collins said none of these inquiries recommended fitting CPDs.

“Safety is the industry’s number one priority but what the ACCC is proposing would introduce unproven engineering characteristics,” Mr Collins said. “People’s lives cannot be experimented with.”

Source: FCAI



Reader's Comments


Comment
  • John goodin June 1, 2018

    The industry is fighting roll over protection devices because they fear massive litigation once they acknowledge the safety problems with quad bikes. Just ask any lawyer their view on defending actions in this area. This is another tobacco industry scam. Training, helmets, banning underage riders and the other proposals will not stop the deaths and injuries which are principally due to roll over crush problems identified by many university studies. I have two quads with CPD’s and this does not create problems with spray packs or any farm operations.
    You have a responsibility to provide a full coverage of this plus details of websites showing results of university tests not the rubbish put forward in your article excusing the manufacturers. I am a farmer who was incredibly lucky to escape injury in a low speed roll over.

  • Carina James June 4, 2018

    Thanks John, But speaking for myself – in really scrubby conditions I DO NOT want roll over devices which may catch on the scrub. And I have ridden and operated quads for well over 20 years – I have had accidents on all sort of mobile work tools including horses and we don’t put roll over devices on them either.

  • Leave a comment

    (First Name and Surname Required) - read our Comment Policy

    (Required)

    (Required)