News

Opinion: Trump in high stakes poker game with other people’s money

Elders Business Intelligence Analyst Richard Koch 17/04/2025

ON April 2 – so-called Liberation Day – Donald J Trump decided to join a game of high stakes poker, bankrolled by other people’s money (the US taxpayer), using US tariffs as his ‘Trump card.’

Richard Koch, Elders

His key financial backers, who were prepared for some risk and a period of higher prices and a mild recession, took money off the table as the magnitude of his bet dawned on them. The bond market expressed this risk most clearly, with Ten-year Treasury yields posting their biggest weekly increase in almost 25 years.

The market was clearly concerned that the size of his bet may lead to a full-blown global financial crisis.

This was the catalyst for Trump to take some risk off the table and reduce the size of his bet (impose the minimum 10pc global tariff) against all other nations except China. China kept calling his larger bets, and he was forced to fold a hand against vital electronic components needed by US manufacturers.

He also lost a series of big bets on US beef and grain; the loss of the beef trade alone is worth US$4 billion (a cost to the industry estimated by US Meat Export Federation at US$150-165/head).

The Trump Presidency is giving Liz Truss vibes (former British Prime Minister who lasted 45 days as financial markets lost confidence in her leadership). Trump is on the clock and has a 90-day window convince the world he is not a bluffer.

The US beef industry is paying dearly for his bet against China. High value US beef cuts that would have been exported to China are being shoved into the meat grinder (and sold as minced meat). The spread between US domestic fresh 90CL and imported frozen 90CL (which they blend with their fatty trimmings to make hamburger patties) has narrowed from +80USc/lb +30USc/lb during the past year.

Australian beef exporters have stared down Trump’s bet and are adamant that they won’t be adjusting their offers, so the US importer, wholesaler and then retailer will need to work out how to meet Trump’s ante.

The slowdown in forward orders from Australia is because US importers are waiting for the tariff-free product (which was on the water before April 2 – there is a four-week sailing time) to clear the market before working out how to handle the cost of new business subject to Trump’s 10pc tariff bet.

Eventually, the importer will have to start putting the tariff on the wholesale customer invoice, maybe as a separate line item i.e. $9/kg plus 10pc Trump bet = $9.90/kg.

Then the US wholesaler must work out how they are going to pass it on to the retailer. If the retailer passes it on – which they will have to do otherwise their profits go down – it eventually reaches the US consumer who sees Trump’s bet as increasing the price of their burger from $9 to $10.

The US consumer will then get an inkling of the consequences of Trump’s poker strategy. And remember it’s just a small bet this time – but his stack has already been crippled by a series of lost hands.

Gradually the US consumer will be awakened to the cost of the bet of the full Trump tariff agenda. Once the US consumer starts to see the impact on their grocery bill, all bets will be off the table.

He has 90 days to revise his poker strategy. Analysts will be currently crunching the numbers and seeing the impact of Trump’s tariff bet on US company profits, and they won’t like what they are seeing.

Trump must decide whether to go all-in (short-stacked) with a pair of deuces vs China holding aces that has him covered … the market will force him to fold.

 

 

 

Leave a Reply to Matthew Della Gola Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Your comment will not appear until it has been moderated.
Contributions that contravene our Comments Policy will not be published.

Comments

  1. Rob Atkinson, 17/04/2025

    Correct me if I’m wrong, but the typical US beef patty is made up of a mixture US beef and Australian lean beef.
    The US hamburger should not be 10% dearer, as only a small portion of the burger has the 10% tariff?

    You make an interesting point Rob. For what it’s worth, we offer the following:

    A typical blended US hamburger is around 78CL, meaning 78pc lean beef, 22pc fat. If we use 90CL Aussie trimmings as the lean component in the blend, it means the fat content is 12pc more. Typical US grainfed fatty trim in the blended pattie can be 65CL, meaning it has to decline 13pc in fatness to get to ‘perfect’ 78CL pattie. Using this crude measure, it suggests the imported lean and domestic fatty trim proportions are roughly 50pc each – so the direct tariff impact in this example would indeed be only on 50pc of the pattie.
    But that ignores the indirect tariff impact being seen on US domestic trimmings supply and price. China has been taking a lot more Brazilian and Aussie lean trimmings since the US imposed the tariff measures. That’s forced up the price further for all domestic US product – so in an indirect sense, that’s also been impacted by tariff action, we’d argue. Editor

    pc

    • Matthew Della Gola, 18/04/2025

      They just need to find people to write trump bashing click bait. I think there are plenty of our own domestic subjects that are actually affecting us locally and nationally which could be run on a treadmill of repatition. Cheers Matthew Della Gola

Get Beef Central's news headlines emailed to you -
FREE!