Yulgilbar Beef Expo: Why Australia needs a genetic export secretariat

James Nason, 07/08/2017

WHAT would it cost to unlock potentially millions of dollars in genetic export opportunities for Australia’s cattle, sheep and goat industries?

Dr Ced Wise spoke at Yulgilbar Station’s 2017 Beef Expo and Forum.

About $100,000 is the considered view of veterinarian and artificial breeding expert Dr Ced Wise.

One year ago Dr Wise told a forum at the Royal Queensland Show that Australia’s seedstock industry was missing a huge opportunity to export genetics to the rest of the world.

Canada, with a cattle herd half the size of Australia, exports $88 million worth of bovine genetics each year, while the United States’ export trade is worth $140m per year.

Despite the high standard of its genetics, Australia’s bovine exports amount to a few million dollars per year.

Also worthy of note is that Canada has just 800,000 sheep but still exports far more sheep genetics than Australia with over 70 million sheep.

Dr Wise told last year’s forum what is needed is funding to establish a new multi-industry body with a permanent secretariat to oversee the genetic export opportunity for all livestock industries – beef and dairy cattle, sheep and goats.

Almost 12 months later, Dr Wise addressed the Yulgilbar Beef Expo last Friday, so we asked if any progress had been made on the call he mounted back in August 2016.

The answer is not a lot, which had meant another year of missed opportunity.

Dr Wise said he had received strong and definitive support from industry. “I received heaps of feedback from cattle and sheep vets and producers from Cloncurry to Western Australia saying if you can get it going we are behind it.”

Asked what was needed, he said about $100,000 in funding to establish a permanent secretariat as a central point to market and manage genetic export inquiry.

“We need the upfront money to kick it off. I am sure we can get enough industry support to cover the ongoing costs of having a secretariat.

“I have done a lot of ringing around, I have got in principal support from everybody I have called.”

He said Minister for Agriculture Barnaby Joyce had made a pre-election pledge to provide $250,000 for the promotion of ruminant genetics exports, but because there was not a formal, industry-wide representative group, it is understood that money has not been utilised.

“If we had $100,000, we can establish a secretariat, get their feet on the ground, and then do a market survey to see where we are going,” he said.

“There is support, everyone could put money into now, but who are they giving it to? We need a secretariat.”

Dr Wise said there is a significant export opportunity because Australian beef genetics are unique to the world and ideally suited to tropical and sub-tropical climates, where most of the world’s cattle production is moving.

Aust needs single export protocol for all markets

At last year’s Royal Queensland Show seedstock industry representatives said the Federal Government also needed to be proactive in negotiating a standard protocol with customer countries.

One of the reasons Canada is seen as being so successful in genetic exports is because it has a single, standard protocol with all countries to which it exports.

This meant that only one test was needed on one animal for Canadian exporters to be able to export that animal’s genetics to a wide range of markets.

Australia has different protocols for every individual importing country. Our exporters have to test the same animal multiple times to comply with the requirements of each customer country, adding significant costs and inhibiting opportunities. Difficulties interpreting each protocol were seen also a challenge.

“We need to develop an Australian standard protocol to minimise biosecurity risks but maximise market access,” Dr Wise said.



Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Your comment will not appear until it has been moderated.
Contributions that contravene our Comments Policy will not be published.


  1. Carlos S. Carmona, 08/08/2017

    We know the problems regarding health protocols. Many bulls in Australia and New Zealand not tested to comply with Philippine requirements in protocol for semen imports to our country.

  2. Ian McDuie, 07/08/2017

    Yes Ced, I agree we need to totally tip the current protocol mess in a hole and get a standard set of rules like Canada.
    But we also need to put the foreign aid approach from Canada in perspective, where they supply, through government agencies, thousands of doses of ‘dated’ semen as part of foreign aid programmes into Asia and Eastern Europe to ‘assist’ Canadian producers.
    This makes it extremely hard for Australian suppliers to even contemplate a competitive marketing initiative into these markets with an expectation of a price that might return a profit.
    Unless we can drastically reduce all the compliance costs (not just protocol testing) of being in the seedstock business, Australian Genetics, despite all the enormous positives of the perception surrounding the ‘Clean/Green Aussie reputation for excellent beef, may quickly find that the market is still too volatile for ‘price-taking producers.
    For a new slant on marketing beef call me on 0425 247 658.

Get Beef Central's news headlines emailed to you -