Grazing Land Management

Cost benefit analysis of prickly acacia undertaken in NT

Beef Central, July 20, 2018

 

 

THE first ever cost benefit analysis of prickly acacia (Acacia nilotica) eradication has emphasised the need for prompt early treatment of small infestations, and has recommened all NT land managers survey properties for prickly acacia to assess treatment options.

Department of Environment and Natural Resources acting regional weeds officer, Nathan Mills, said the report, authored by ArGyll Consulting, has also led to the development of a decision support tool that pastoralists can use to undertake analysis on their own properties.

“The Territory has a land‑based economy and good land management practices are critical to its future,” Mr Mills said.

“That’s why it’s important for land managers, such as pastoralists, to eradicate prickly acacia as soon as they possibly can, before this invasive weed spreads and impacts their bottom line.

“Prickly acacia is a Class A (to be eradicated) and Class C (not to be introduced) weed in the Northern Territory and can reduce pasture production if left unmanaged.

“Against the costs of control in terms of labour and chemicals are the benefits of increased or avoided losses in carrying capacity.

“The weed’s thorns can damage vehicle tyres and injure animals with thickets restricting mustering and stock access to water.

“Since it was first recorded in the Northern Territory in the 1980s, weed surveys have found prickly acacia is now found in all regions of the Top End, extending all the way to the Barkly.

“Case studies on the Barkly and Victoria River District, highlighted in the report, show that while infestations remain relatively small, eradication can be achieved at a relatively low cost.

“The recommendation to come out of the report is that all land managers who have prickly acacia on their properties conduct a full survey to measure the current extent of the problem and estimate the potential impact on productivity.

“The decision support tool can then be used to review options for treatment and identify the most cost-effective path to eradication.”

Source: NT Govt. To view full report click here and to request a copy of the decision support tool email [email protected] More information about prickly acacia at this NT Govt link: www.nt.gov.au/pricklyacacia 

 

HAVE YOUR SAY

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Your comment will not appear until it has been moderated.
Contributions that contravene our Comments Policy will not be published.

Comments

  1. Chris Le Feuvre, July 23, 2018

    The weeds are not the problem. The weeds are only the symptom of the problem. The problem is our continuous grazing systems. If we spend millions of dollars on the symptom we will still have poor land condition. if we were to spend more money on the problem we would have more ground cover, less run off, more water retention , better drought tolerance ,less erosion ,less overall weeds ,and a continual improvement of the land rather than a continual decline in land condition.

  2. Max Davis, July 23, 2018

    So called ‘land managers’ should also be educated on maintaining good land condition. When I look at the photos above, and wherever I have seen prickly acacia on the Barkly, land condition has been extremely poor. It should be no surprise that weed species are growing in these areas. Weed management is far easier when land condition is healthy and there is plenty of ground cover.

  3. Ron Shaw, July 21, 2018

    It’s the same for all weed species, detect and act promptly and eradication is both possible and relatively low cost.
    For us landholders to do this, we need to be able to IDENTIFY all the weed plants (that could be reasonably expected to occur in your region).
    Given the 100’s of millions $$ weed cost Australians, why is there no regular WEED identification seminars available to attend.
    Whilst this story is a good way to inform us (about prickly acacia), the advice still leaves you wondering. For example, there are (I believe), a number of native species that has similar appearance (e.g. dogwood wattle). So a bit of information titled “Not to be confused with these species”, could be quite helpful.

Get Beef Central's news headlines emailed to you -
FREE!