VFF members were told this week its board had decided to “cease our membership or provide notice of resignation where required” of several national agricultural groups.The notice to VFF members said the cost of the combined memberships to national agricultural advocacy amounted to close to $700,000 each year.
Feedback so far suggest the VFF withdrawal is not expected to cause major issues to the national bodies involved.
WoolProducers president and Victorian wool grower Steve Harrison said he recognised the NFF and VFF membership models were “broken” but the VFF board decision would not change the makeup of the WPA board “at this stage.”
However, Mr Harrison said the timing of VFF president Emma Germano and the board in making the decision was not right.
Mr Harrison said he is an independent board member of WPA, and the VFF delegate on WoolProducers Bradley Venning, also would not be affected by the VFF board decision for at least another 12 months.
Sheep Central was told the VFF position will not affect the makeup of the Sheep Producers Australia board.
SPA chair Andrew Spencer said Sheep Producers Australia works daily to ensure a productive and profitable national sheep meat industry.
“Our role is to advocate for a sustainable and profitable future for the Australian sheep industry.
This is achieved through Sheep Producers Australia’s policy council and board, working with our members, service providers, government, and many other partners,” he said.
“We will be working hard to ensure that Victorian sheep farmers continue to have a strong and relevant input into the critical national sheep meat policy issues.”
The VFF membership notice went on to state that the VFF board is concerned the national agricultural advocacy model is fundamentally broken.
“We will not force Victorian farmers to continue funding as unsustainable and ineffective model that delivers duplication and fails to meet the needs of Victorian agriculture.
“Furthermore, the cost to the VFF in many cases is much higher than the contribution made by other organisations,” the notice said.
“It is patently unfair to expect our members to carry this burden when others do not contribute their fair share.