
Fires burning in Qld’s Arcadia Valley. Source: Rowan Peart
A QUEENSLAND producer is calling for some “small changes that would make a big difference” in the management of fires, asking authorities to allow for wider breaks along fence lines and loosening the rules on backburning.
Rowan Peart and his wife Maddie run two properties – one in the Arcadia Valley in Central Qld and one near Moonie in Southern Qld.
While both properties avoided the fires seen in recent months, Mr Peart said he had experienced many of the issues previously raised about bureaucracy and fear of litigation in past efforts to control fires.
“I never want to sound like I am ungrateful for the Rural Fire Service, I am a volunteer myself but I think the RFS is getting a layer of bureaucracy put on it that is limiting us from being able to safely and effectively fight fires,” he said.
“I think the fire department’s main goal is to prevent loss of life and everything else comes a distant second. Of course, we don’t want anyone to lose their life, but as farmers whose livelihoods are at stake, we put a lot more emphasis on protecting infrastructure and grasslands than the RFS.”
He said the current situation was untenable and two minor regulation changes would make a big difference to managing fires.
That was the first time I had ever heard that you could not use backburning to control a fire
Allowing wider breaks along fence lines
Under the current Qld vegetation management regulations, the entire easement for a fence line on freehold land can be 10m wide. “Necessary” clearing is allowed to maintain existing infrastructure and fire breaks can be 20m wide or 1.5 times the tallest adjacent tree.
Mr Peart said he would like to see all fence lines classified as infrastructure.
“We have a lot of leasehold country where our fences can only be cleared to 6m wide – not many machines used for clearing are that narrow,” he said.
“These fence lines are often where you backburn from and it is really dangerous when you are stuck between a fire and a fence within a 6m window, especially toeing a trailer. All you need to have is one tree fall over in front of you and things can get very ugly very quickly.
“All other infrastructure can be protected by a break that is 1.5 times the tallest adjacent tree and fence lines, should be treated the same. This should include State Forest leases.
“If the fence is your responsibility to maintain, then you should have the right to clear up to 20m either side of the fence. This would also serve as a defendable line when the fire season is on and help stop the widespread destruction that seems to be becoming more regular,” he said.
Mr Peart said the construction of exclusion fences across Qld had involved a significant capital outlay from producers and more needed to be done to protect them.
“Exclusion fences are just so incredibly expensive, it can be up to $10,000/km for materials and construction,” he said.
“I have seen cases where an exclusion fence is pretty much destroyed after a fire.”
Allowing for earlier backburns
The second change Mr Peart said he would like to see was a loosening of the restrictions on backburning. He said fear of litigation was stopping landholders from backburning and putting them in some dangerous situations.
“We had a fire here about four-years-ago that was out of control and heading for our place. When we went to do a backburn we were told it was a total fire ban, I nearly fell over on the end of the phone,” he said.
“That was the first time I had ever heard that you could not use backburning to control a fire. Now, we are seeing them not issue permits to backburn unless the fire is an imminent threat and if you wait until then it can be 11am and blowing a gale – a time when no one would want to backburn.”
Mr Peart said he understood why the fire department was heading in this direction, but he said it was not a practical measure for producers.
“I know the RFS doesn’t want every cowboy lighting up fire fronts whenever and wherever they like, but when we simply cannot ask our local fire warden for permission – the situation has become too complex” he said.
“It really rubs people up the wrong way when farmers have been doing this for a long time, they understand fires, they understand the terrain and know where to cut them off.
Mr Peart concluded “These changes would have a positive, tangable effect on bushfires in Australia. I don’t know if anything will change, I only ask; if not, why not?”