Time to act against animal activists, says VFF

Beef Central, 20/06/2014

Victorian livestock producers are demanding the Victorian State Government implement an election promise to curb animal activists’ attacks on farms.

During the 2010 State election campaign the Coalition promised to “ensure that adequate legislation exists to protect all food producers from unreasonable attacks by extremist animal rights lobbyists”.

VFF livestock president Ian Feldtmann said the VFF had twice written to the Victorian Attorney General Robert Clark requesting the government deliver on its 2010 Election promise.

“All we’ve had so far is ‘reassurances’ that action is being taken,” Mr Feldtmann said.

“And I notice this week Agriculture Minister Peter Walsh said it’s ‘a work in progress’.”

“But here we are, with just 18 sitting days left until the 2014 State Election and there’s no legislation on the table. We need to see the detail.”

Mr Feldtmann said farmers had taken action in the past against animal activists, but it had cost them years in the courts and vast sums in legal fees.

“No-one should doubt farmers’ determination to make animal activists accountable for their actions,” he said. “You only have to look at our efforts in pursuing the Hahnheuser case.

In 2003 animal activist Ralph Hahnheuser delayed the shipment of live sheep from Portland to the Middle East by contaminating their feed and water with shredded ham.

The VFF lodged an Australian Farmers’ Fighting Fund application to pursue Mr Hahnheuser through the courts, which involved an unsuccessful trial in the Federal Court, a subsequent successful appeal to the full Federal Court, and a successful re-trial in which Mr Hahnheuser was ordered to pay damages and costs.

Ultimately Mr Hahnheuser became bankrupt upon filing his own debtor’s petition on March 6 this year, 11 years after contaminating the feedlot.

It was a landmark case, but cost us dearly in time and money. It’s the very reason we need stronger state and federal legislation to protect us against activists.

Source: VFF


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Your comment will not appear until it has been moderated.
Contributions that contravene our Comments Policy will not be published.


  1. Tim Perrett, 21/06/2014

    Orlando may be correct, saying people should be held accountable for their actions.So should people implementing false accusations against others,especially through media outlets.
    As a grazier I have recollection for 40 years in the industry and can say up front (not hiding) that I’ve never witnessed animal cruelty at home, in saleyards or at the abattoirs, and I very much doubt Orlando has either.
    I also believe the Australian people are becoming aware of the damage these radical activists do to industry and justice will prevail in due coarse.

  2. Ben Hammer, 20/06/2014

    Orlando Browning, the article refers to the attacks on the farming operations of Australians, in Australia, by none other than supposed well meaning people. In particular the sabotage of animals feed and water. This was proven in a court of law to have been perpetrated by an “Animal Rights Activist”. How can someone pertaining to be “for the animals” and “against cruelty” deliberately contaminate the very feedstuffs and clean water supply of the very animals they wish to protect? Where can they justify deliberately poisoning any animals food in order to protect these animals from cruelty? By his actions, this man actually inflicted suffering upon the sheep. Anyone stop to consider that? There are more stories, in print, of “animal rights activists”, illegally entering farming enterprises during the night, using flash lit photography to obtain “evidence” only to have the same bright and sudden flash of light startle and cause panic amongst the animals within the facility. These animals then ‘rushed’ in fright, the sheer weight of panicked bodies smashing the facilities they were housed within. How many animals required veterinary treatment or destruction as the direct result of the trespassers actions? If the “animal rights activists” really cared about the animals, they would never be so blatantly stupid as to cause injury or suffering to these same animals.
    And just in case you were not aware, farmers ARE ACCOUNTABLE for the welfare of their animals. It seems the only smoke to be seen with this issue is from fires lit by the animal rights activists themselves, fires which endanger the health and wellbeing of the animals themselves.

  3. Orlando Browning, 20/06/2014

    Farmers should be held accountable for the welfare of their animals, including, the abattoirs in which their animas are slaughtered. CCTV in all slaughter houses is an effective way to implement high animal welfare standards. We all know where there is no smoke there is no fire. It seems animal cruelty is an issue in the agricultural sector, if not, why are the farmers, the Nationals and the Agricultural Ministers, both state and Federal, running scared. What do they have to hide? The Australian public would like to know.

Get Beef Central's news headlines emailed to you -