Australian beef: Time to let the Ferrari out of the garage

James Nason, 20/07/2018


Just when it seemed the war on red meat had stretched the limits of believability comes news that a large US company has informed its staff it won’t be refunding employees for expenses that involve meals with meat.

Provided the 6000 employees of ‘WeWork’ around the world buy plant-based foods and not poultry, pork or red meat while on the clock their expenses will be reimbursed. The company has also banned the serving of meat at events held at its 400 locations around the world.

Issues of ‘nanny-state’ corporate over-reach and rights to personal freedom of choice aside, the move is the latest example  of how anti-meat propaganda from vegan groups and companies selling lab created ‘meat’ are influencing perceptions that farmed livestock are bad for the planet, despite plenty of evidence to the contrary.

Within the last week reports emerged that Air New Zealand and Virgin Atlantic are hitching their brands to the anti-meat movement to boost public perceptions about their own sustainability. Given that aviation has been described as the world’s biggest environmental sin both airlines may be better served focusing on their own emissions rather than what’s on their menus.

Last month Google bowed to the ideology of the tiny vegan minority by removing the ‘egg’ that used to appear in its salad emoji:

If, rather than simply accepting the anti-meat claims of vested ideological and commercial interests, these companies instead explored the work being done around sustainability in agriculture, they would see that a compelling case exists to embrace products like Australian beef for sustainability reasons.

At Beef 2018 in Rockhampton the Australian Framework for Sustainable beef and the AgForce-led Grazing Best Management Practice program won high praise from global food industry sustainability leader Nicole Johnson-Hoffman, who described the Australian beef industry’s work as jaw-dropping, farmer-led and world leading.

But her final message was that Australia had to do more to ensure that work was better known and understood around the world.

Being able to measure and demonstrate sustainability progress and what is being done to continually improve is a cost of doing business today, and the sustainability framework and Grazing BMP are critical planks in ensuring the Australian beef industry can demonstrates its sustainability credentials.

But if that work is not being actively and strongly promoted it is a little like having Ferrari but leaving it in the garage.

As touched on in an earlier article (Can Australian agriculture afford not to promote itself more actively?) it is no accident that the biggest companies in Australia are also the biggest advertisers, investing heavily to ensure consumers understand their values and trust their brands.

Australian agriculture has a compelling, credible and powerful story to tell on sustainbility but by not investing to share their story more widely public messaging around beef is being dominated by those who are: vegan groups and fake meat brands.


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Your comment will not appear until it has been moderated.
Contributions that contravene our Comments Policy will not be published.


  1. Patrick Burgers, 25/07/2018

    The problem with beef is it has no eccentric value. All we do to promote and inform is give people facts about nutrition and minerals. Whereas people are more able to link-in when you bring it closer to what interest them. “get more from the sun” chicken is “lean and healthy” fish is “fat and healthy” Good creative people should put their thinking caps on and think from the angle that the consumers are. Personally I find it unique that an animal can have so much difference in eating quality, and taste. Also I find it unique that this is practically the only protein, people can eat raw. But again, that are intrinsic values.

    For readers’ benefit, Patrick is a well-known meat wholesaler and distributor handling Australian beef in the Netherlands. Editor

  2. Brian O'Shea, 24/07/2018

    The arguments made that state beef production requires 10,000 litres of water to produce one kilo is so lame. The water used in beef production is completely recycled and continues to be. Once harvested the water in the animal is all that is applicable the rest has returned to the water cycle and the water table.

    We are running scared of a minority group that shouts loudly. Remember when going into a paddock in the summer. All you can hear are the crickets rattling away. Look to the shade and you will see the cattle quietly chewing the cud.

    In truth the ‘vegan’ group are the crickets. Lots of noise not much substance.

Get Beef Central's news headlines emailed to you -