MLA MD Jason Strong’s views on anti-meat activism, alternative proteins

Beef Central, 25/11/2019

EIGHT months into his new job as Meat & Livestock Australia managing director and CEO, Jason Strong gave a frank and forthright account of his views on anti-meat activism and the perceived threat to red meat from plant based proteins during last week’s annual general meeting in Tamworth.

The Lemontree feedlot invasion took place the week before he started in his new role, followed by a series of well-publicised animal activist protests across Australia, focused on abattoirs, retail outlets and Melbourne’s busiest intersection outside Flinders Street Railway Station.

MLA MD Jason Strong addresses lasr week’s AGM

“With such public displays of activism against our industry, it’s easy to think that our industry is ‘under attack’ this year, more than ever before,” Mr Strong told stakeholders attending last week’s AGM.

“So naturally, the question I’ve been asked countless times is, What’s MLA doing about it?”

Before offering an answer, Mr Strong offered a few facts, to add context.

While anti-meat extremism had recently spiked in news headlines, 80pc of that coverage had been favourable towards red meat producers, he said.

“We’re seeing the general public, also fed up with extreme animal activists. The public has joined the call for jail sentences and fines for farm invaders. The public stood shoulder-to-shoulder with our industry – applauding when the trespass laws were passed – to punish such outrageous actions.”

The fact was, red meat producers were trusted by consumers, he said.

MLA research showed that:

  • 61pc of consumers felt that producers make a positive contribution towards society
  • Nearly two-thirds of consumers say the industry’s animal welfare practices are good, or very good.

“The bottom line is that there’s no evidence of any tidal wave of consumers turning to veganism,” Mr Strong said.

For the last three years, the number of urban Australian’s who identified as vegan or vegetarian had remained stable at 7pc. And more than three-quarters of that group regarded themselves as ‘flexitarian’ – someone who occasionally eats meat.

Red meat top protein, in value terms

Insights from industry research confirmed that by value, red meat remained the most popular protein with Australian consumers, with red meat and vegetables the most popular meal in Australian households, Mr Strong said.

For consumers, the main barriers to getting more beef on the table were price, and health.

“It’s true that red meat prices at the checkout are rising -but this is something to be celebrated,” he said. “After all, we’re producing a high-quality, consistent product. Increasing the value of our product is what it’s all about, especially when those returns filter all the way back along the supply chain.”

Even though prices are rising, consumers were seeing value in the beef they buy, with results from MLA’s recent ‘Australian Beef the Greatest’ campaign showing that a growing number of consumers are willing to pay more for beef.

So what’s MLA doing about the anti-meat agenda?

“Quite a bit actually,” Mr Strong said. “Our focus is firstly to engage with the community, telling the story of how red meat is produced responsibly, and secondly making the cost and health perception of red meat more palatable.”

He provided three recent examples:

  • At the heart of MLA’s Good Meat program was a website for consumers and the community, telling the story of the Australian red meat industry’s welfare, environmental and health credentials.
  • MLA’s Paddock to Plate Virtual Reality project was a great interactive tool which ‘figuratively’ transports the user into the supply chain, proudly showing how red meat is produced. The immersive 360-degree virtual reality experience has been viewed by more than 75,000 Australians at food festivals, royal shows, primary schools and farmers’ markets.
  • “We already know that consumers trust producers – so who’s better placed to tell the story of Australian red meat, then actual producers,” Mr Strong said. “We’ve worked with many producers, providing them with the support and confidence to act as “advocates” for our industry. These producer advocates have gone on to tell their story at countless community events, in schools or through the media.

MLA was also working with chefs and butchers, teaching them the value of secondary cuts, identifying red meat meal solutions that kept the costs down, and most importantly, kept red meat on the menus of restaurants and corporate catering providers.

“As we know from our research, cost is a major barrier for consumers, so MLA demonstrates cost-effective options using non-primal cuts to foodservice and retail teams. In doing this, not only do we inform our retail and foodservice partners about red meat, but it indirectly extends the message to consumers, when chefs and butchers themselves start to tell consumers the good story of red meat and the value of secondary cuts.”

MLA was also working closely with health professionals including dieticians and GPs, because when they provided advice, consumers sat up and took notice, Mr Strong said.

MLA’s ‘So What’s for Dinner?’ campaign reached a quarter of Australian GPs, providing them with resources on how to encourage patients to eat a healthy diet which includes the recommended amounts of red meat.

Consumer response to plant-based proteins

Mr Strong said another common question he was asked was, whether plant or alternative-based proteins were a threat to Australian red meat.

“Like animal activism, plant-based proteins have received a lot of air-time this year. At first glance, it can seem that this protein will pose major competition to our product,” he said.

“So again – let’s look at the facts.”

“Plant-based alternatives aren’t new. What is new are alternatives seeking to mimic the experience of eating red meat – its taste, its smell and its appearance – but without the perceived animal welfare or perceived environmental impacts,” he said.

“What’s also new are the cell-based products that are grown in a lab, rather than in a paddock.”

Mr Strong said MLA was keeping a close watch on these alternatives to red meat – and most importantly – on the reaction of consumers to these products.

“It’s important to note that MLA’s market research indicates there’s low consumer awareness of cultured and synthetic meat and only a modest number would like to try these products.

“Only 5pc of Australians claim to eat plant-based proteins, like tofu, on a weekly basis.

Global mega trends indicated ‘health’ and ‘wellbeing’ and a preference for ‘natural, quality foods from trusted sources’ were important to consumers. Coupled with this is strong consumer interest in provenance and production.

Marketers of red meat could make claims their products are natural and minimally processed, while manufacturers of lab-grown meat and plant protein products would have a much tougher job to make these same claims, Mr Strong said.

“But, to remain relevant in this competitive environment, we need to continue to focus on the consumer – understanding their concerns, desires and must-haves – and delivering on these.

“That’s why programs like Good Meat, the Australian Beef Sustainability Framework and MLA’s other work in telling the story about red meat production and its sustainability are not nice-to-haves – but must-haves,” he said.




Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Your comment will not appear until it has been moderated.
Contributions that contravene our Comments Policy will not be published.


  1. Phil Coote, 07/12/2019

    As an ex beef producer, I feel that your MLA’s Paddock to Plate Virtual Reality project should be available online so it can be used online and on social media to debunk the unsubstantiated rubbish that militant extremist animal activists share on social media.

  2. Chris King, 25/11/2019

    Consumer concerns arise from inflated claims on the use of resources to produce beef setting up doubts on sustainability. It is ignored that most of the global base beef production & breeding comes from extensive areas (Australia, Brazil, US, Canada) that can not be cropped or utilised for other means. It is ignored that water consumption in claims is calculated from all rainfall falling on pastures, or that the majority of global supplementary feed is from byproducts. Hence cattle are effectively converting resources that otherwise would not be utilized by monogastrics. It ignores the contribution of manure & the value recirculation of resources has on soils. Also there is a lack of consideration if ruminant production was not economic who would maintain the areas currently grazed & how would that land be utilized or where the increased crop production would come from. There needs to be more substantiation & thoughtful overview before suggesting simplistic alternatives to beef production.

Get Beef Central's news headlines emailed to you -