News

Draft bill pushes for immediate reporting of animal cruelty evidence

Beef Central, 02/12/2014
Veterinarian and Liberal Senator for WA Chris Back

Veterinarian and Liberal Senator for WA Chris Back

Draft legislation which would require evidence of malicious animal cruelty to be reported without delay is to be introduced to the Senate by veterinarian Senator Chris Back.

The proposed bill is also directed against anyone who intimidates, threatens or attacks a person associated with a legally operating animal enterprise or trespasses onto or vandalises the property of anyone conducting a legally operating animal enterprise.

The draft legislation which Senator Back says will protect animals under the Criminal Code has gained Party room support from the Coalition Government.

Dr Back said the first part of the bill ensures that if a person takes visible images of action they believe to be malicious cruelty to animals, they must report this to the responsible authority with a minimum of delay.

This would enable authorities to investigate and act swiftly to ensure further cruelty is averted.

“Recent examples of activist groups presenting visual images taken sometimes up to twelve months previous to disclosure, effectively prevents responsible authorities from accurately investigating these allegations,” Senator Back said.

“As a result, any capacity to fully examine allegations or evidence, prosecute if proven, and prevent further incidences of cruelty are severely limited.

“The motives of many activists are clear by their own published statements.

“They want to see the end of Australia’s livestock industries with many opposing meat production and wanting to drastically reduce Australia’s meat consumption.

“Activists are agitating against many of Australia’s primary activities in the pig, beef, sheep and wool, and sheepmeat industries. This action is intended to harm Australia’s enviable reputation for the overseas supply of livestock and products and our advancement in animal husbandry and welfare standards. In so doing, they are directly attacking Australia’s export trade and the profitability of agricultural and rural communities generally.”

Senator Back noted a recent decision by RSPCA NSW to cease prosecution of animal cruelty charges against a NSW piggery due to unlawfully obtained video footage.

In its decision to discontinue proceedings it was stated that “RSPCA NSW implores any person who witnesses or obtains evidence of animal cruelty to report it to the relevant authority immediately.”

The second component of the draft bill is directed against anyone who intimidates, threatens or attacks a person associated with a legally operating animal enterprise or trespasses onto or vandalises the property of anyone conducting a legally operating animal enterprise.

“Such actions are criminal in nature, invade the privacy of affected persons and can place animals at risk from a welfare, health and husbandry viewpoint,” Senator Back said.

“Of equal importance is the threat to Australia’s biosecurity from animal activists who are trespassing on quarantine or intensive animal production facilities. The animal welfare and economic disaster which would unfold in the event of an exotic disease outbreak in Australia is beyond comprehension.

“The draft legislation is designed to complement that of Australian States and Territories.

“If a member of the public believes they have witnessed an act of malicious cruelty to an animal or animals, they should report it to the responsible authority immediately via phone or online in the state or territory that it took place. Following reporting, they should then provide any footage obtained within five days of filming the event.”

HAVE YOUR SAY

Your email address will not be published.

Your comment will not appear until it has been moderated.
Contributions that contravene our Comments Policy will not be published.

Comments

  1. Roland Halpern, 05/02/2015

    You realize this is a clever ruse. If a person, for example an undercover investigator, has to immediately report the first instance of cruelty observed, the investigator is exposed and thus the chances of documenting systematic cruelty have vanished. It’s like require an undercover cop to arrest the first petty drug dealer he or she finds, which doesn’t touch the kingpins who simply find another chump to make their deals. So too would the factory farm owners be insulated. Yes, they may get a small fine, but what prosecutor is going to take on a case where there is only a single piece of evidence and the results of a conviction meaningless.

  2. Yvonne Schaefer, 04/12/2014

    Finally, a bit of balance in the situation. At least now the people who are doing the wrong thing… animal owners, trespassers, or others with an agenda are all on a level playing field.

  3. Pam Alle, 03/12/2014

    I think this rocks! Should be introduced in the US as well on a federal level. Only thing I’d add is to invalidate images taken during a criminal act (breaking/entering/trespass) to discourage the animal rightist ‘raid’ which has become more common.

  4. Brian, 02/12/2014

    I can’t see any reason to set a truck on fire.

Get Beef Central's news headlines emailed to you -
FREE!