AS a result of the multiple cruise ship Coronavirus disasters, the Australian public quite understandably sees ocean going vessels as one of their most serious threats for future infections.
In the case of cargo vessels including livestock carriers, the reverse is the case.
Visiting a port for loading or discharge represents the only opportunity for the crew to become infected with the outcome being a spectacular human and commercial disaster for both the crew, the charterer and the owner of the vessel.
The recent experience with the MV Al Kuwait in Fremantle is a good example.
In the event that someone onboard the ship infects a land based person during contact in port, that infected person will be quarantined and monitored once a diagnosis is confirmed, contacts will be traced and dealt with after which life goes on. If hospitalization is required then there will be well prepared facility not too far away.
In the event that a crew member is infected by a land based contact, the situation is far more serious. Assume the crew infection occurs in port A. The ship sails off towards port B and the symptoms appear in the crew member say 4 to 5 days out to sea. In the meantime, the infected person will have transmitted the infection to several other shipmates before symptoms were observed and effective quarantine measures could be instigated. Ships accommodation areas are relatively small, high density spaces so opportunities for transmission are plentiful. It is quite feasible that 10% or more of the crew could be infected before a suspect case is identified and control measures could be instituted. The total crew on my current ship is 37.
In advance of entering a new port the ship must report its health status along with all the other usual information required by the onshore authorities. What will be the response when it advises the port authority that there are a number of cases with Covid-19 like symptoms onboard? At best there will be delays to permission to enter the port until appropriate measures are taken to protect those land based contacts as well as preparing to deal with any crew that might need hospitalization. The vessel may be sent to anchor offshore while medical assessments are completed and a course of action decided. Delay, delay, delay. Sick crew members will be taken ashore to isolation or hospital while the vessel must wait at anchor while the infection plays out in the rest of the crew. This could take weeks. Business is halted, lives are disrupted and no clear end to the mess can be identified. Ships are such an expensive asset that this down-time is hugely disruptive and may even threaten the viability of the business.
The owners and officers of the vessel have already considered all of these potential scenarios and have very logically instituted extremely strict protocols to protect the crew from land based infection. By default this also provides highly effective protection for land based persons from the crew.
The ship protocols include :-
- Only those people absolutely essential to the process of entry to the port and loading or discharge of the cargo are permitted to come aboard. e.g. Pilot, quarantine (human and animal), immigration, customs, medical, commercial agent.
- Entry to the ship via a single gangway requires that the incoming person has their temperature taken (rejected if showing fever), wear a minimum of a mask, wash hands using sanitizer and sign the log showing who they are, what they are there for and when they entered and departed.
- Each visitor is personally escorted to their destination by a crew member in full personal protective equipment (PPE) who makes sure they only go where they must and then leave as soon as they have finished.
- All crew have their temperature taken twice per day.
- Incoming crew members, stockpersons and me, the onboard vet, must undergo a 14 day isolation period before being permitted to join the ship.
When all these measures are combined, the Australian public can be very confident that the crew of livestock vessels represent a negligible risk to the health of land based populations while they continue their vital work of exporting our livestock to ensure essential food supplies continue to flow to our international customers.
Spare a thought for the existing crew who have for the last 3 months been blocked from entry to any county in order to travel to the nearest international airport to fly home after their contract term has finished. Crew changes are not possible so everyone is forced to remain onboard until the pandemic situation improves to a point where international travel is available once again. As I write this story from a cattle vessel, there are two Indian engineers onboard who joined the ship in Singapore to monitor some specialist equipment during the voyage to Fremantle. By the time they arrived in port the virus infection had become a pandemic and they were refused permission to leave the ship in order to fly home. Since then they have sailed to New Zealand, China, Townsville, Vietnam, Townsville, Vietnam again and still have no idea when they might be able to leave. After our next return to Australia, if they are not permitted to leave the ship when it docks in Gladstone, Queensland, they will sail to Chile where the ship will load with a cargo for China before they can have their next opportunity to leave the vessel and go home.
Ross, an excellent summary of how it is, hopefully your article will be widely read. I am told some of the Phillipines crew members have not had a break for 12 months or so. It guess overall it shows how resilient the Aust livestock export industry is. Steve
A first class, hands on report Dr. Ross, it maybe ease some of the “what if'” questions to several, but not all, especially those that reserve a complete negativity about most things.