Genetics

Changes for Angus structural soundness EBVs

Beef Central, 02/02/2021

CONSIDERABLE changes have been made to the Structural Soundness EBVs that were first published on Australian Angus cattle in the December 2020 TransTasman Angus Cattle Evaluation.

That was the message delivered by Angus Australia’s Breed Development & Extension Manager, Andrew Byrne, at a recent Angus CONNECT Research & Development Update.

The Structural Soundness EBVs had been the subject of considerable discussion among Angus breeders in recent times, culminating in the need to make improvements being highlighted as a priority by Angus Australia’s genetic evaluation consultative committee, Mr Byrne said.

“Angus Australia has listened to this feedback, and has undertaken a comprehensive review of the Structural Soundness EBVs that are published,” he said.

The five Structural Soundness EBVs previously published will be replaced by two new EBVs, being Foot Angle and Claw Set.

Foot Angle EBVs are estimates of genetic differences in foot angle (strength of pastern, depth of heel), with lower Foot Angle EBVs indicating an animal is expected to produce progeny with more desirable foot angle, being a 45-degree angle at the pastern joint with appropriate toe length and heel depth.

Claw Set EBVs are estimates of genetic differences in claw set structure (shape and evenness of claws), with lower Claw Set EBVs indicating an animal is expected to produce progeny with more desirable claw structure, being toes that are symmetrical, even and appropriately spaced.

“It is important that Angus breeders are aware that lower EBVs will now be associated with more desirable structure, as opposed to the previous EBVs where higher EBVs were more favourable,” Mr Byrne said.

The new EBVs will be calculated using new analytical software, that among other things, offers the advantage of enabling the submission of multiple structural scores over time for the same individual animal, the submission of structural scores for mature females, and the incorporation of genomic information into the EBV calculation.

Another feature of the new Structural Soundness EBVs is that the analysis will now be conducted jointly with the American and Canadian Angus Associations.

In addition to greatly expanding the volume of information that is available to the analysis, the breeding values published for Australian Angus animals will now be directly comparable to the breeding values published on North American animals, Mr Byrne said.

If Australian breeders are looking at potential North America sires to use within their breeding program, they can take the Foot Angle and Claw Set EPD and times it by two and it will give the equivalent EBV in Australia, he said.

Likewise, dividing the Australian EBV by two will produce the EPD that will be directly comparable to the Foot Angle and Claw Set EPDs published on North American animals.

While considerable changes will be made to the manner in which Structural Soundness EBVs are calculated and displayed, the scoring system by which the feet and leg structure of Angus animals is assessed for inclusion in the Trans-Tasman Angus Cattle Evaluation remains unchanged.

Animals will still be assessed on a 1-9 scoring system, with front and back feet assessed separately.

In a move to try and increase the number of animals being structurally scored, particularly yearling and mature females, breeder-collected scores will now be accepted for inclusion in the calculation of Structural Soundness EBVs, alongside scores collected by independent, accredited assessors.

“The changes that have been made to calculation and display of Structural Soundness EBVs, along with attempts to increase the number of structural scores being submitted for analysis, will increase the number of animals for which EBVs are published, and the accuracy of those EBVs,” Mr Byrne said.

  • Information on changes that will be made to the Structural Soundness EBVs that are published on Angus animals is available via this link.  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

HAVE YOUR SAY

Your email address will not be published.

Your comment will not appear until it has been moderated.
Contributions that contravene our Comments Policy will not be published.

Comments

  1. Mike Introvigne, 02/02/2021

    Will this lead to an improvement in the structural integrity of cattle regardless of breed, I doubt it. Buyers should ultimately dictate the future of structure but it appears that buyers are still paying top dollar for animals that are not within sound structural parameters. Why, because the catalogue said that the animals have been structurally assessed and have an EBV telling them what they should actually see for themselves. Let’s not find an EBV for everything under the sun as it wont lead to improvement and will make the next generation of cattlemen and women lazy when it comes to understanding what determines a sound animal. We must never loose the ability to assess and understand what makes good productive cattle because anyone worth a pinch of salt should be able to determine structural integrity from visual appraisal, at least seedstock producers should. Lets use objective measurement and peformance recording systems for the things we can’t readily see from a visual appraisal. An alternative reason for using structural soundness EBV’s is to absolve the seedstock producer from having to guarantee their product because the buyer had EBV’s to tell them what the animals structural soundness was from the EBV. Now that is a sad thought but not out of the relms of possibility in todays society.
    A message to seedstock producers, forget the structural soundness EBV’s and learn to breed sound cattle backed with a sound guarantee. We will never get to a point where 100% of what we breed is perfect but at least we will take ownership of the issues ourselves.

Get Beef Central's news headlines emailed to you -
FREE!