
BEEF producers targeting the European Union market now have less than four months to ensure they are compliant with the EU’s Deforestation Regulations on imported beef, due to come into effect from 1 January.
In fact the process is already underway, with Australian EU-eligible grainfed cattle going onto feed this month already having to comply with EUDR regulations, given the feeding period and the protracted transport time to get product into market, given the closure of the Strait of Hormuz.
For grassfed cattle, compliant cattle will start to be processed in around six weeks’ time.
Since 2024, the EU has twice granted 12-month extensions to the deadline for the start of the new EUDR deforestation rules, based on lack of preparedness and administrative challenges.
But trade sources have told Beef Central it would be ‘ill-advised’ for the industry to assume that yet another extension might be made between now and the start of 2027.
“The industry is working on the assumption that the new rules will definitely apply from 1 January,” the contact said.
“Even though Australia is considered low risk, even if only one percent of the eligible properties are audited by the European Commission, we need to make sure Australia does not kick a bad own-goal,” he said.
“Our EU customers are all saying the new requirements are coming, from 1 January,” a second large multi-site export processor told Beef Central on Friday.
Under the EUDR legislation, EU importers must prove that land used to produce beef (and certain other commodities) has not been subject to deforestation or forest degradation since December 2020. They must also show that production followed local laws in the country of origin.
Australian producers and exporters of affected products will need to give information to EU importers to help them meet these requirements.
While there is a six-month dispensation on the starting date for ‘small’ suppliers, for the purposes of the legislation, all Australian beef producers fall into the ‘large’ or ‘medium’ category, where the 1 January deadline applies.
For the purposes of imported beef, geolocation of the property of origin is the primary requirement (one coordinate for each establishment where the cattle have been kept). EU importers will then use this information to submit a ‘due diligence statement’ before the goods reach the EU.
Australia’s Livestock Production Assurance program now provides a geolocation sharing tool so producers can enter coordinates for their LPA Account. Guidance on using this tool is available through LPA.
Other tools are also being developed, such as Cibo Labs’ EUDR Deforestation Assessment Service, to help verify compliance and share required information through supply chains.
Solid early start
The most recent EUDR references on the European Commission website from 13 July indicates that the 1 January deadline remains in place, updating the list of products covered by the legislation and the functioning of the information system for submitting due diligence statements and simplified declarations.
One of the encouraging points from Australian beef’s perspective is that a substantial number of EU-accredited Australian beef producers have already completed their EUDR compliance requirements. There are about 3600 Australian beef producers currently holding EU accreditation, of which about half are already EUDR compliant, Beef Central has been told.
The remaining 1500-1800 must still comply in order to supply cattle intended for the market. Of course, not all will necessarily be intending to turn-off EU cattle between now and the end of 2026.
Hides now excluded
One significant development last year for Australia’s EU access was that hides are no longer included under the EUDR legislation
As Beef Central reported in July, hides were removed from the EUDR legislation, while other by-products, like beef tongues, were added.
As many Australian hides can end up in the EU – either directly or indirectly via hides processors and tanners in countries like China – there was concerns the legislation could cripple Australia’s hides market.
Perhaps more concerning for Australia are signs that the UK Labor Government may be re-aligning with EU regulation in fields like EUDR. Currently no deforestation legislation applies on exports to the UK, but if the UK simply adopts or conforms with the EU policies, possibly as part of a UK/EU Free Trade Agreement, it could significantly broaden the scope of the EUDR process, Beef Central has been told. Calendar year to the end of July, Australia’s exports to the UK have reached 13,400t, up 55pc on last year.
That could include regulation around EUCAS, and EUDR.
EU’s dramatic Brazil decision
Access for Australian beef into the EU will take on additional significance, following the EU’s dramatic decision to ban Brazilian beef and chicken imports from Thursday this week (3 September).
The EU’s ban cites concerns that Brazil cannot demonstrate compliance with EU restrictions on antimicrobial use in food-producing animals. Essentially, antibiotics can be bought ‘over the counter’ in Brazil, and the country cannot provide sufficient guarantees that animals intended for export have not been produced using antimicrobials for growth promotion or therapeutic reasons.
In 2025, Brazil exported 83,000 tonnes of fresh and frozen beef to the EU. Separately, Brazil has access to a United Kingdom WTO beef quota for fresh, chilled and frozen beef of 11,143t. In 2024 imports from Brazil were 8pc of the UK’s total beef imports.
Leading farming organisations and animal health experts in the UK last week called for a similar ban on Brazilian meat imports, in line with the EU decisions.
- Further work with Cibo Labs is also underway to support EU-accredited beef producers in responding to the new EUDR requirements. Beef Central will report more as the project progresses.
I say to the European Union to keep your nose out of our business, buy our meat or don’t buy it. You people have half destroyed your own countries, so keep your nose out ours with your left wing agenda.
Absolutely agree don’t like what we do or what we don’t do simply don’t buy them then or trade with us grow your own
the E.U have given our farmers ample time to get their act together . The Govt has spent valuable time and expense negotiating these contracts. Forget the politics and get on with delivering the meat to the E U. 2yrs is long enough
Prey tell, what is ‘de-forestation-rates’, when discussing beef trade; other than a barrier-to-entry … set by those that do not understand anything beyond their apparent ‘wokeness’, nor ever want to … ? IMO
Everyone will always usually judge others by their own standards; and everyone else will come up short … blinkered-bias and benign-belligerency.
As a semi retired stock agent/Auctioneer with 50 years experience I can recall a number of times when an Auctioneer would react to some questionable behaviour from the buying fraternity by the following question and I quote “Do you want em or not?”
I can’t for the life of me work out why that attitude should not apply to the Europeans.
First it was antibiotics where they would prefer us to let an animal suffer. Now they’ve got the hide to dictate to us whether or not we can knock over a few trees. Enough enough.
All this stupid EU policy does is say, if in the past you or previous owners completely flattened all the vegetation on your property then that is great and we will buy beef from you. Brigalow belt in Qld a classic example of massive deforestation combined with buffel grass leading to phenomenal cattle country and highly sought after land.
Just the same as most environmental policy. It rewards those that destroyed everything and those that managed properly are now the evil ones should they continue to manage as they did for decades. Clearing trees as required but maintaining a % of tree coverage at all times.
In any case I suspect a fair proportion of EU properties will continue to clear trees as necessary and the EU bureaucrats will just tick a box and say job done. What is next on the list.