A key question Australian cattle producers are being asked to consider in the latest discussion paper released as part of the Cattle Transaction Levy Review is whether the levy’s collection mechanism should change.
Should it remain a flat, fixed-rate levy that does not change regardless of market or seasonal conditions, as it has for the past 20 years?
Or should it move to a more value-based approach, such as a levy calculated as a percentage of an animal’s value?
The latest discussion paper says the consultation process has raised discussion about an “ad valorem” or indexed levy collection mechanism, where the levy would represent a percentage of the overall value of the transaction or price indexed against an industry benchmark, such as the Eastern Young Cattle Indicator (EYCI).
“(This) could offer greater equity to industry members, especially during times of drought,” the paper states.
“This could also be considered a more modernised approach to levy collection, given the separation of the value of certain production system units becoming far more distinct and the industry less homogenous than 20 years ago.”
The case for switching from a flat-rate levy to an ad valorem, or percentage-of-value, levy has been raised in recent years by commentators including Simon Quilty (here) and Justin Toohey (here), who argued a percentage-based levy would provide a more equitable payment model and better reflect an animal’s true value at the time of sale.
Percentage-based levies are already used in some agricultural sectors, including coarse grains and wool. The wool levy, for example, is based on a percentage of gross wool sale proceeds, with levy payers voting every three years to determine the applicable rate for the next three years.
Feedback on fixed versus percentage-based levies provided to a 2014 inquiry into agricultural levies highlighted differing views. Some respondents preferred the current flat-rate system because of its simplicity, while others believed a percentage-based levy would disproportionately affect producers selling higher-value cattle, such as stud stock and premium Wagyu.
Mr Quilty has proposed capping a percentage-based levy at a maximum amount per head as one way of addressing those concerns.
Others have previously argued for a higher fixed-rate levy to better reflect today’s higher cattle values, while some have opposed any increase or questioned whether a levy should exist at all.
The latest discussion paper acknowledges that “there are arguments in favour and against” an ad valorem model.
It says careful analysis would be needed to determine an appropriate percentage rate, ensure equity across high- and low-value transactions, and address other considerations before such a model could be formally presented to industry.
The paper asks producers whether an ad valorem levy would provide a fairer outcome for individual levy payers and benefit the industry as a whole.
It also seeks feedback on whether an indexed levy, such as one linked to a benchmark like the EYCI, would provide a more appropriate charging mechanism that delivers broader industry benefits.
The opportunity for producers to provide direct feedback continues at face to face meetings this week and through until the end of August at the following locations:
- Monday 3 August 6 pm – Malanda, Malanda Hotel Ballroom – Register Here
- Tuesday 4 August 10 am – Conjuboy, Oasis Road House – Register Here
- Tuesday 4 August 6 pm – Charters Towers, Charters Towers RSL – Register Here
- Friday 7 August 9:30 am – Brisbane, Rydges Hotel – Register Here
- Monday 10 August 1:30 pm – Moree, Weebollabolla Sale Complex –Register Here
- Monday 10 August 5:30 pm – Kununurra -Kimberly Grande Resort, Argyle Room –Register Here
- Tuesday 11 August 9:30 am – Glen Innes, Glen Innes RSL
- Tuesday 11 August 3:30 pm – Walcha, Walcha Bowling Club – Register Here
- Wedensday 12 August 11:00 am – Tamworth, 3R Angus – Register Here
- Thursday 13 August 9:00 am – Dubbo, Polldale Sale Complex – Register Here
- Thursday 13 August 4:00 pm – Orange, Conobalas Hotel – Register Here
- Monday 17 August 11 am – Cloncurry, Concurry Precinct – Register Here
- Monday 17 August 5 pm – Longreach, Birdcage Hotel – Register Here
- Tuesday 18 August 12 noon – Augathella, Bowls Club – Register Here
- Tuesday 18 August – Roma, The Club Hotel – Register Here
- Monday 24 August – Alice Springs, Arid Zone Reaserch station
- Tuesday 25 August – Tennant Creek, Barkly Business Hub
- Thursday 27 August – Katherine, Reaserch Station
- Friday 28 August – Darwin, John England Building
As we all have the option of which sector of the beef industry we wish to partake in, I believe that a flat rate is the most equitable.
When we start to allocate portions of the levy revenue to competing sectors we will open the debate over entitlements.
Has anyone done an audit as to what is a workable revenue target from the transaction levy ?
Surely we should have an objective to take the industry forward within the current invironment.
A flat percentage rate is completely fair … IMO
1% of nothing is nothing … and 1% of something, is something.
If Australia is selling around # 9.4-Million head per annum, then it’s reasonably transparent as to taking a fee as necessary. And some cattle get sold more than once, as they move through the value-added chain, down-stream towards beef becomes meat.
So, set a rate that’s fair to both parties, and should be based on value given and received … and that system should work just fine.
IMO
A flat rate per head only. If they changed to a percentage of the sale price will only paying many people to assess this and more constant reporting from the producer. The producer would have to produce sale documents fir this to then be charged. Must be some people wanting to set up a business and be paid by the producer.
A percentage based levy is not fairer, quite the opposite in many cases, particularly in southern Australia, where cattle are traded several times. For the sake of simplicity, assume a breeder sells a weaner, then the backgrounder sells to a feedlot, and the feedlot sells to a meat-works. Currently, that would generate $15 in levies, each owner paying $5 for the margin he/she generated. However, under an ad valorem levy, the breeder would pay the least, with the feed-lotter paying nearly three times as much, even though their margin might well be the least, with much higher costs. Hardly fairer. The added issue is that levies paid also govern the voting entitlement at the MLA AGM, so that whoever sells the final animal under an ad valorem system would also accrue even more votes. Since many feedlots are owned by the processing sector, this may give rise to some disquiet among producers, who believe that the MLA is set up for producers, while the AMPC is the processors body.
All these issues were thrashed out when the Transaction Levy was first introduced, and the flat rate deemed the fairest, unless the Leckie model (similar to a GST) was adopted. The Leckie model was considered too complicated, hard to explain and more expensive at the time. Maybe it’s time has come?
i Agree to leave it as a flat rate to move to a percentage based system they can see dollars NOT ON
We cant set the sale price and take the hit always cant pass on fuel cost now prices are falling further below CPI